On a Sunday afternoon in the year 1996, a lone gunman wielding powerful firearms killed 35 people in the Tasmanian tourist destination of Port Arthur.
That massacre nearly three decades ago, which sparked some of the most stringent firearm regulations in the world, can appear as a bygone age for many citizens.
However, the tragedy in Bondi this past Sunday, which claimed 15 lives, has brought back painful recollections of the 1996 shootings.
A study released earlier this year revealed that there are now in excess of four million guns in private hands across the country – a figure that is nearly twice the amount from the late 1990s.
This translates to approximately a weapon for each small group of people.
While the state of Queensland has the largest arsenal, followed by NSW and Victoria, it is the island state and the NT that have the greatest density of weapons.
The data also challenges the popular notion that guns are mainly owned by people in regional areas.
Weapons are prevalent in cities and their outskirts, with a sizable percentage located in major cities.
Critically, there are now firearms concentrated among fewer owners, with the typical gun owner possessing over four firearms.
Gun control laws in Australia are not uniform across the country, with a patchwork implementation of rules in various regions.
Typically, to apply for a gun licence, an individual must be of legal age, deemed a "suitable candidate", pass a training and safety course, and provide a "legitimate need" for ownership.
The accepted reasons include sport shooting or animal management, marksmanship, certain job-related needs, and collecting.
However, significant gaps remain. For instance, young people in some areas can have supervision of a firearm from as young as early adolescence.
Following the Port Arthur massacre, a major rewrite of national gun laws was enacted, leading to a large-scale surrender scheme of over 650,000 firearms.
Rapid-fire weapons were banned, and background checks alongside waiting periods for sales were introduced.
A key tenet of these reforms was the removal of "personal protection" as a acceptable grounds for gun ownership.
In the immediate aftermath the Bondi shooting, political leaders were forceful about the need to tighten gun laws.
A national gun buyback scheme was unveiled, marking the first such effort since 1996.
Other suggested measures now under consideration include:
There are also calls for regular reviews of existing licence holders, acknowledging that "situations evolve" over time.
These swift actions have drawn criticism from some quarters.
Pro-gun advocates contend that limiting gun numbers would not have stopped an attack driven by violent beliefs.
They suggest that focus would be better spent combating radicalisation rather than restricting lawful owners for the great bulk of responsible owners.
Furthermore, a critical reform from 1996 – a centralised weapon tracking system – remains incomplete, though it has now been listed as a priority.
For reformers, the Bondi attack is a tragic indication that policies must keep pace with technological advances.
They argue that modernisation is needed to "keep up-to-date" and prevent future tragedies.
While mass shootings remain infrequent in Australia compared to some nations, the threat persists, and the legacy of guns in the wrong hands – through poor storage – continues to pose a problem.
As one advocate reflected, "It is regrettable that it takes such a loss of life to focus attention and take notice."
A quantum physicist and tech writer with over a decade of experience in quantum computing research and industry applications.